Lakewood Lemon Law Lawyers
If your vehicle has repeated warranty-covered defects, you may have rights under California’s Lemon Law. A Lakewood Lemon Law attorney can review your vehicle’s repair history, explain your legal options, and determine whether you may qualify for remedies available under California law.
$500,000
Premises Liability
$1.4 Million
Brain Injury
$3.3 Million
Motorcycle Accident
$2.0 Million
Car accident
$1.0 Million
Ride Share Accident
$1.1 Million
Motor Vehicle Accident
$110,000
Truck Accident
$500,000
Trip and Fall Accident
$1.0 Million
Medical Malpractice
$250,000
Airline Accident
$500,000
Premises Liability
$1.4 Million
Brain Injury
$3.3 Million
Motorcycle Accident
$2.0 Million
Car accident
$1.0 Million
Ride Share Accident
$1.1 Million
Motor Vehicle Accident
$110,000
Truck Accident
$500,000
Trip and Fall Accident
$1.0 Million
Medical Malpractice
$250,000
Airline Accident
Case Results
$3.3 Million
Motorcycle Accident
$2.0 Million
Car accident
$1.4 Million
Brain Injury
$1.1 Million
Motor Vehicle Accident
Lakewood Lemon Law Attorney
A vehicle that repeatedly develops warranty-covered problems can disrupt your commute, family responsibilities, and daily routine. If the manufacturer or an authorized repair facility has been unable to correct the same problem after a reasonable number of opportunities, California’s Lemon Law may provide a refund, replacement vehicle, or another remedy.
Heidari Law Group represents consumers in Lakewood and throughout Los Angeles County in claims involving defective cars, trucks, vans, motorcycles, and other qualifying vehicles. Whether a vehicle qualifies depends on its warranty, repair history, type of defect, ownership or lease status, and other circumstances.
When Does a Vehicle Qualify Under California Lemon Law?
California’s Lemon Law generally applies when a manufacturer cannot repair a warranty-covered problem after a reasonable number of opportunities. The defect must substantially impair the vehicle’s use, value, or safety and must not have been caused by unreasonable use, abuse, or an unauthorized modification.
There is no single number of repair attempts that decides every claim. The seriousness of the defect, the repair history, and the total number of days the vehicle was unavailable may all be considered.
California’s Lemon Law presumption may apply when certain events occur within 18 months of the vehicle’s delivery or before it reaches 18,000 miles, whichever occurs first. Depending on the circumstances, the presumption may apply when:
- The manufacturer or its authorized repair facility made four or more attempts to repair the same problem.
- Two or more attempts were made to repair a defect that could cause death or serious bodily injury.
- The vehicle was unavailable because of warranty repairs for more than 30 cumulative days.
The 18-month or 18,000-mile period is not necessarily the deadline for every Lemon Law claim. A vehicle may still qualify outside that period when the problems arose during the applicable warranty, and the manufacturer received a reasonable opportunity to repair them.
What Types of Vehicles May Be Covered?
California Lemon Law protections may apply to qualifying vehicles purchased or leased in California, including:
- Cars
- Pickup trucks
- Vans
- Sport utility vehicles
- Motorcycles
- Certain business vehicles
- The chassis, chassis cab, and propulsion components of some motor homes
The vehicle generally must be covered by an applicable manufacturer’s warranty when the qualifying problem is presented for repair.
Coverage is not limited to brand-new vehicles. Certain used vehicles may qualify when they were sold with the remaining balance of the manufacturer’s original new-vehicle warranty or another applicable manufacturer-backed warranty.
A separately purchased service contract or dealer warranty does not necessarily provide the same rights as a manufacturer’s new-vehicle warranty. An attorney should review the warranty documents, purchase agreement, and repair history before determining whether a used vehicle may qualify.
Can Leased Vehicles Qualify?
A leased vehicle may qualify for protection under California’s Lemon Law when it is covered by an applicable manufacturer’s warranty and otherwise satisfies the legal requirements.
Lessees should preserve their lease agreement, repair orders, payment records, communications with the manufacturer, and any notices received from the dealership or leasing company.
Can a Business Vehicle Qualify?
Certain vehicles purchased or leased primarily for business use may qualify. California law generally limits this category to businesses with no more than five vehicles registered in California. The qualifying vehicle must also fall within the applicable gross-weight limit, generally less than 10,000 pounds.
Because the business-use rules contain specific conditions, the registration records, vehicle weight information, warranty, and ownership documents should be evaluated before a claim is pursued.
What Problems May Support a Lemon Law Claim?
A defect generally must substantially impair the vehicle’s use, value, or safety. Examples may include recurring problems involving:
- Brakes
- Steering
- Transmission
- Engine performance
- Electrical systems
- Battery or charging systems
- Airbags
- Fuel systems
- Vehicle stalling
- Loss of power
- Water intrusion
- Infotainment or control systems
- Advanced driver-assistance features
A minor cosmetic issue may not qualify by itself. However, several recurring problems may collectively affect the vehicle’s use or value.
Eligibility depends on the nature of the problem, the applicable warranty, the number and quality of repair attempts, the time the vehicle spent unavailable, and the manufacturer’s response.
Who Is Responsible for a California Lemon Law Claim?
A statutory repurchase or replacement claim is commonly made against the vehicle manufacturer rather than the dealership. The manufacturer is generally responsible for fulfilling the obligations provided by its warranty.
A dealership may still be relevant when a case involves separate issues, such as:
- Misrepresentations during the sale
- Failure to disclose known damage
- Dealer-issued warranties
- Improper repair practices
- Financing or contract violations
- Fraud or concealment
The proper parties will depend on the facts and the legal claims available.
What Records Should You Collect?
Documentation can help establish when each problem occurred, how often the vehicle was presented for repair, and what the dealership or manufacturer did in response.
Consumers should preserve:
- Purchase or lease agreements
- Manufacturer warranty documents
- Repair orders
- Service invoices
- Dealership inspection reports
- Towing and rental-car receipts
- Photographs and videos
- Emails and text messages
- Letters sent to or received from the manufacturer
- Records of telephone conversations
- Recall notices
- Vehicle registration documents
- Loan or lease payment records
Every repair order should accurately describe the problem reported by the consumer. Before leaving the dealership, review the document to confirm that the complaint, mileage, repair dates, diagnostic findings, and work performed are correctly recorded.
A consumer should also keep a timeline showing when the problem occurred, warning lights or symptoms observed, repair visits, and the number of days the vehicle was unavailable.
Do You Have to Notify the Manufacturer?
Consumers should promptly report warranty problems, present the vehicle to an authorized repair facility when required, and preserve written communications with the dealership and manufacturer.
A separate written notice or demand may be required or strategically appropriate depending on:
- The warranty or owner’s manual
- The manufacturer involved
- The applicable arbitration program
- When the vehicle was purchased or leased
- When the claim arose
- The legal procedure being used
Because the requirements can vary, consumers should not assume that dealership repair visits alone satisfy every notice or pre-suit requirement.
Is Arbitration Required?
Arbitration is an alternative process for resolving warranty disputes without a traditional trial. Many manufacturers participate in arbitration programs certified by the California Department of Consumer Affairs.
Whether arbitration is optional, required before pursuing a particular claim, or advisable depends on the manufacturer, warranty documents, timing of the claim, and current California procedures. California has revised portions of its Lemon Law process, and certain participating manufacturers may be subject to different pre-litigation requirements.
Before accepting an arbitration decision or signing a settlement, consumers should review the terms carefully. A settlement or release may affect the ability to pursue additional remedies.
What Remedies May Be Available?
Depending on the facts, California Lemon Law remedies may include a manufacturer repurchase, a replacement vehicle, or a negotiated monetary resolution.
Manufacturer Repurchase
A qualifying repurchase may include some or all of the following:
- Down payment
- Monthly vehicle payments
- Remaining loan balance
- Certain registration and licensing charges
- Applicable sales taxes
- Certain manufacturer-installed options
- Reasonable incidental expenses associated with the warranty problem
The manufacturer may be entitled to deductions permitted by law, including a mileage offset based on the consumer’s use of the vehicle before the defect was first presented for repair.
A repurchase is therefore not always equal to every dollar the consumer has paid.
Replacement Vehicle
A consumer may be offered or may seek a replacement vehicle when legally available and acceptable to the parties. The terms should be reviewed carefully, including financing, taxes, registration, warranties, and any proposed deductions.
Negotiated Monetary Resolution
Some consumers choose to keep the vehicle and resolve the dispute through a monetary payment. Whether this is appropriate depends on the defect, repair history, safety concerns, remaining warranty, and proposed settlement terms.
Incidental Damages
Certain documented expenses caused by the warranty problem may be recoverable when authorized by law. Examples may include qualifying towing, rental-car, or transportation expenses.
Lost wages, medical expenses, and personal injury damages are not automatic Lemon Law remedies. When a vehicle defect causes a collision or physical injury, separate product liability, negligence, or personal injury claims may need to be evaluated.
Attorney’s Fees and Costs
California’s warranty laws may permit a prevailing consumer to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and costs from the manufacturer. Fee recovery depends on the legal basis of the claim, the outcome, and applicable law. Consumers should review the law firm’s fee agreement before representation begins.
Can Vehicle Modifications Affect a Claim?
A manufacturer may argue that an aftermarket modification, misuse, neglect, or unauthorized repair caused the problem.
A modification does not necessarily defeat a claim when it is unrelated to the defect. For example, an unrelated cosmetic modification may not explain a recurring transmission or electrical problem.
However, a claim may be more difficult when evidence shows that the modification caused or contributed to the defect. Consumers should disclose all modifications and provide installation receipts, maintenance records, diagnostic reports, and other relevant documents to their attorney.
What Are Implied Warranties?
An implied warranty is a legal protection that may exist even when it is not written in the same form as an express manufacturer warranty.
The implied warranty of merchantability generally concerns whether a vehicle is fit for the ordinary purposes for which similar vehicles are used. A vehicle that cannot provide basic, reliable transportation may raise implied-warranty issues.
Implied-warranty claims have separate requirements and limitations. The available rights may depend on whether the vehicle was new or used, who sold it, what warranties accompanied the transaction, and whether the vehicle was sold as-is.
How Long Do You Have to File a Claim?
Many California breach-of-warranty claims are subject to a four-year limitations period. However, determining when that period begins can be legally complicated.
The deadline may depend on:
- When the consumer knew or reasonably should have known of the warranty breach
- The type of warranty
- The manufacturer’s repair representations
- Whether the deadline was paused or extended
- The legal claims being asserted
- The date of purchase, repair, denial, or other relevant conduct
Consumers should not calculate the deadline solely from the first symptom or repair visit. Waiting may result in lost records, unavailable witnesses, or missed legal deadlines.
What Happens if the Manufacturer Denies the Claim?
A manufacturer’s denial does not necessarily determine whether a vehicle qualifies under California law.
After a denial, a consumer may be able to:
- Submit additional repair or warranty records
- Respond to the manufacturer’s stated reasons
- Send a formal demand
- Participate in an applicable arbitration program
- Negotiate a resolution
- File a lawsuit when legally appropriate
An attorney can review the denial, identify missing evidence, evaluate procedural requirements, and explain the available options.
How Can a Lakewood Lemon Law Attorney Assist?
A Lemon Law attorney can review the vehicle’s history and determine which warranty and consumer-protection laws may apply.
Legal assistance may include:
Reviewing the Claim
An attorney can examine the purchase or lease agreement, warranties, repair orders, service records, communications, and proposed settlements.
Evaluating Potential Remedies
The attorney can explain whether the records may support a repurchase, replacement vehicle, negotiated payment, or another remedy.
Communicating With the Manufacturer
Legal counsel can prepare correspondence, respond to the manufacturer’s arguments, and communicate with the manufacturer or its representatives.
Addressing Procedural Requirements
An attorney can evaluate whether notice, a demand, arbitration, or another pre-litigation procedure applies to the claim.
Filing a Lawsuit
When litigation is legally appropriate, an attorney can prepare the required documents, manage discovery, present evidence, negotiate potential resolutions, and represent the consumer in court.
No attorney can guarantee the result of a Lemon Law claim. Outcomes depend on the evidence, warranty terms, repair history, manufacturer, applicable procedures, and law.
Lakewood Lemon Law Questions
Is a vehicle automatically a lemon after four repair attempts?
No. Four repair attempts for the same problem may support California’s Lemon Law presumption when the other requirements are satisfied, but each case is evaluated according to its circumstances.
A serious safety defect may require fewer attempts, while other claims may depend on the number of days the vehicle was unavailable or the overall repair history.
Does a vehicle have to be within 18 months or 18,000 miles?
Not in every case. That timeframe relates primarily to California’s Lemon Law presumption. A claim may still be available outside the presumption when qualifying warranty problems arose,e and the manufacturer had a reasonable opportunity to repair them.
Are used vehicles covered?
Certain used vehicles may qualify when they remain covered by the manufacturer’s original new-vehicle warranty or another applicable manufacturer-backed warranty. A dealer warranty or service contract may create different rights.
Are leased vehicles covered?
Leased vehicles may qualify when they are covered by an applicable manufacturer’s warranty and satisfy the other legal requirements.
Can a business-owned vehicle qualify?
Certain business vehicles may qualify when the business has no more than five vehicles registered in California, and the vehicle falls within the applicable weight limit.
Can a manufacturer charge for the miles driven?
A manufacturer may be entitled to a statutory mileage offset in a qualifying repurchase. The calculation generally focuses on the mileage before the vehicle was first presented for repair for the problem giving rise to the claim.
Can I keep the vehicle and receive compensation?
A negotiated cash resolution may allow a consumer to keep the vehicle. The consumer should consider the continuing defect, safety concerns, remaining warranty, vehicle value, proposed release, and settlement amount before accepting such an agreement.
What happens if an accident is caused by the defect?
A collision caused by a defective vehicle may involve legal claims separate from a statutory Lemon Law claim. Product liability, negligence, personal injury, insurance, and warranty issues may need to be evaluated independently.
Should I stop making vehicle payments?
Consumers generally should not stop making loan or lease payments solely because a Lemon Law claim is pending. Missing payments may damage credit or lead to repossession. A consumer should obtain legal and financial advice before changing payment arrangements.
Speak With a Lakewood Lemon Law Attorney
If your vehicle has undergone repeated warranty repairs or has remained unavailable for an extended period, Heidari Law Group can review the repair history and discuss the legal options that may be available.
A case review does not guarantee that a vehicle qualifies or that a particular remedy will be obtained. The evaluation will depend on the warranty, repair records, vehicle use, manufacturer, and applicable California law.
Authoritative References
- California Department of Consumer Affairs – California Laws & Resources (Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act)
https://www.dca.ca.gov/acp/law.shtml - California Department of Consumer Affairs – California Lemon Law & Arbitration Certification Program
https://www.dca.ca.gov/acp/
Contact Us
Practice Areas
testimonial
Amazing Car Accident Lawyer
“Saman is by far true to his word. He truly was available at all times and always kept me updated. In the end, he settled my case with a great results. He didn’t treat me like a file, he treated me as if he was representing family. If you are looking for open, fast, thorough and a detailed lawyer, look no further. I will definitely recommend him to anyone seeking legal services who wants to feel assured that they are in the best hands.”
Amir
Persistent
“I was injured in a car accident. The lawyer made sure that I went to my chiropractor sessions and that I get the medical attention needed. I also got MRI’s as needed and also got back injections as needed. He was very persistent on contacting me, even when I wasn’t reachable, and making sure that I got treated right and paid a good amount at the end. He is a very respectful person and great lawyer.”
Wendy
An Extraordinary Experience
“Thank you for your unwavering commitment to my case. Words do not adequately describe my feelings, when no one seemed to care about an old vet with an injury you were there. I can remember as clearly as though it were yesterday, your sincerity and desire to help me. For that, I will always be grateful. Your endless commitment of time, financial resources and a personal concern for my physical well being surpassed anything I could have expected or imagined.”
Ron
Related Articles
- What are Economic and Non-Economic Damages in a Personal Injury Case?
- Personal Injury Lawsuit Timeline
- How Are Pain and Suffering Damages Calculated? – Just Contact Sam
- What Compensation Can I Seek for My Injuries? – Just Contact Sam
- Liability and Fault in Construction Accident Cases
- Keeping Safe While Utilizing Rideshares: What You Should Know as a Passenger
- Traumatic Brain Injuries After an Accident: What Victims Need to Know in Concord
- What to Do After a Personal Injury Accident in Anaheim
Sam Ryan Heidari
Sam Heidari is the founding principal of Heidari Law Group, a law firm specializing in personal injury, wrongful death, and employment law. Sam Heidari has been practicing law for over 11 years and handles a wide range of cases including car accidents, wrongful death, employment discrimination, and product liability. The Heidari Law Group legal firm is known for its comprehensive approach, handling cases from initial consultation through to final judgment
Contact Us
24/7 Free Case Evaluation
Serious Representation, Real Results
Los Angeles Office
3530 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 710 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Tel: 213-884-4881Fax: 213-884-4588
info@HeidariLawGroup.comIrvine Office
17875 Von Karman Ave. Suite 150 & 250 Irvine, CA 92614 Tel: 949-239-1020Fax: 949-239-1021
info@HeidariLawGroup.comSacramento Office
180 Promenade Cir Ste 300 Sacramento, CA 95834 Tel: 916-461-1818Fax: 916-461-9797
info@HeidariLawGroup.comBakersfield Office
3501 Mall View Rd Suite 105 Bakersfield, CA 93306 Tel: 661-409-0000Fax: 916-461-9797
info@HeidariLawGroup.comLas Vegas Office
611 S 6th Street Las Vegas, NV 89101 Tel: 702-722-1500Fax: 702-722-1600
info@HeidariLawGroup.com